Thursday, February 15, 2007

Sir Branson's Philanthropy

Recently, the Chairman of the Virgin Group, Sir Richard Branson, announced that he would reward $25 million to the scientist who could discover a process that would significantly reduce the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases. His claim, which is apart of his announcement in September when he pledged to invest $3 billion to fight global warming, has caused reactions that demonstrate the mixed views of this topic. Despite the evidence supporting Branson’s critics regarding this issue, where their contentions that insufficient findings on the subject of the removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere are valid, the effects of his philanthropic venture will not go unnoticed. As he fulfills his pledge, Branson should find others starting to demonstrate an appreciation for the commitment he has made. Consequently, his mission to save the world may inspire individuals across the world to do their part in changing the planet as well. These individuals may decide to buy vehicles that utilize alternative fuels; others may power their homes using solar panels. A strong desire for wind energy has been demonstrated by many concerned with global warming. The fact of the matter is that the commendable example set forth by Branson could significantly provoke similar, though smaller scale, earth-friendly actions by businesses and general consumers alike. The significance of this possibility is that a true stimulation of anti-global warming industries – industries such as those in alternative fuels, hybrid vehicles, and non-oil consuming sources of energy – may come to fruition. This stimulation would be vital, for a competition-driven market guided by the nature of capitalism would bring such earth-saving industries into consumer spotlight. A viable economic demand such as this would therefore be the real cure for the world’s atmosphere. Once the point is reached where green technology is sensible not only environmentally but also financially, a true change may occur, for at this junction sufficient motivation for such investments would exist.

4 comments:

supcomm said...

intresting article. personally i like
alternative energy sources like geothermal and such, hey ive even messed with hydrolysis. happy blogging

Beats said...

I definetly agree supcomm and the author. Alternate energy sources are the way to go. Reduce green house gases and possibly become a leading creater of a new car. i like Hydrogen personaly. Fueled off of water with a by-product of oxygen. Imagine, driving and breathing your exhaust but instead, it's healthy. Fuel your car at any water garden hose. Only down side, hydrogen is extremely flammable and unstable, so when you get into a car crash the compromises the fuel tanks, instead of burning to death, you blow up.....

supcomm said...

or, during hydrolysis excess amounts of chlorine gas are produced * using too much salt does that*... "why does it smell like a pool down here"

but ya hydrogen all the way

rserafin said...

i would definently have to agree with the author and i think the alternative energy sources are a pretty cool idea... plus the added benefits to the atmosphere. plus...how cool would it be to get the award for finding the alternate source! if we can get this type of technology who knows what could be next.

rserafin